[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [IPk] Medical Conservatism (was medical ignorance)
Well I'd say in academic research in general, that's not really the case.
but you can't really generalise, because it really depends on the specific
field. Certainly in my field it's not at all like that - very much the
opposite in fact. Bright sparks, new young blood, and ideas from other fields
are actively encouraged. People get bored with the same old crusty ideas and
the same old crusty people.
I can't really speak for the field of medicine, but no doubt Nanette or
someone else can. My feeling is that medicine is still quite traditional in
that respect, but things are changing there too.
On Tuesday 30 October 2001 10:04, you wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that - sociologically - academic research and
> medicine are the two most hidebound and traditional professional areas of
> Meaning in terms of learning new things and insisting that the profession
> itself is the fount of all knowledge; having a strong "not invented here"
> syndrome. That gives a strong scepticism to anything from outside the
> profession, and a (possibly) blinkered faith in anything from inside.
> I picked this up when I read in a book by Dr Andrew Walker
> (sociologist/theologian at Kings) that these two areas still maintained the
> medieval "apprenticeship" system for learning "how to do it" - you have to
> be supervised by an existing professional for a number of years in your
> Bit of a tangent, but I'd be interested to hear any views.
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
help SUPPORT Insulin Pumpers http://www.insulin-pumpers.org/donate.shtml