Re: [IPk] Funding
I would suggest that the All Party Parliamentary Group for Diabetes be
challenged to put pressure on the Secretary of State for Health to extend
the statutory obligation to Scotland as well. The Minister for Health up
here was recently quoted as saying that he "expected" NHS organisations to
apply the recommendations of the Health Technology Board for Scotland (now
Quality Improvement (Scotland)).
Several Trusts have set up committees to review all the recommendations of
HTBS/QIS to decide whether or not each recommendation should be applied in
their Trust area and, if so, under what conditions.
Just in case someone tries to argue that Scotland is a different issue, I
work in a Trust and can assure you that, while Scotland has its own Health
Minister under devolution, the intention of the NHS is that Health will be
dealt with consistently throughout the UK, hence HTBS/QIS concurring with
every NICE guideline made to date.
I would also suggest that the Group seek formal clarification from the
Secretary of Health regarding the terminology "...unless there are special
factors relating to particular appraisals which mean that full
implementation may take longer." I believe that many Trusts will use this as
a "get out" clause.
All the best,
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Davis" <email @ redacted>
To: <email @ redacted>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:06 PM
Subject: [IPk] Funding
> Insulin Pumpers is made possible by your tax deductible contributions.
> Your donation of $10, $25, or more... just $1 or $2 per month is
> needed so that Insulin Pumpers can continue to serve you and the rest
> of the diabetes community. Please visit:
> Your annual contribution will eliminate this header from your IP mail
> I will be discussing insulin pumps (at the request of Diabetes UK) with
> All Party Parliamentary Group for diabetes at the House of Commons on the
> Tuesday 10th June,
> To those of you who are having problems with your PCT's regarding funding.
> would like to hear of any instances of PCT's refusing to fund pumps. If
> can provide documentary evidence, so much the better. In fact I would like
> details of any decision by the PCT's which has been responsible for you
> receiving either a pump and or, funding and would like your replies as
> possible so that I may incorporate them in my presentation.
> If there are any other points you would like me to raise, please let me
> I have already included the question of test strips! So anything else?
> To those engaged in negotiations with your PCT, Please note the following
> don't take no for an answer, especially if you have the backing of your
> diabetes team.
> John Davis
> Do NHS organisations have to find funding to follow NICE Guidance?
> Under clinical governance arrangements, NHS organisations in England and
> have to take all NICE guidance into account. In January 2002 the
> announced a statutory obligation for the NHS in England and Wales to
> funding for treatments and drugs recommended by NICE as a part of its
> technology appraisals work programme, but only if considered appropriate
> the clinician and patient. Those responsible for providing healthcare
> are now responsible for making funds available to support NICE appraisal
> guidance within 3 months unless there are special factors relating to
> particular appraisals which mean that full implementation may take longer
> Do health professionals have to follow NICE's decision?
> Once NICE guidance is published, health professionals are expected to take
> fully into account when exercising their clinical judgement. However, NICE
> guidance does not override the individual responsibility of health
> professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the
> individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their guardian
> for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact:
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: