[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[IPk] Re: (Elizabeth)
At 09-03-00 05:03 -0800, you wrote:
>unopened. I don't recall opening mail to the board: it was just stuck in
>their in boxes or forwarded with information for the next board meeting.
When rung (they rang me) by the BDA on Monday I was told that what had
happened was exactly as you stated above.
Since then I have received blatant evidence that that has not been the case.
I enclose part of an 'excuse'??? for the delay.
"Letters were received for an imcomplete list of Trustees, it has taken some
get together a complete set"
This implies that someone has assumed that the letters were meant for every
trustee, and at least one had been opened beforehand (but that is not
relevant), and could result in someone receiving mail that was not meant
I also note that I have received another email in which the trustee told me
that none of the mail I referred to had been received. But that the trustee
had received mail sent to head office, from individual members, about
another subject. This mail was neither meant nor sent to all the trustees.
Yet if the excuse above was true that mail would have been opened,
photocopied and sent to every trustee. Thus opening wide the BDA for taking
different action dependant upon how somebody feels.
By the way did you come across Paul Streets at Amnesty International - he
was most probably a clerk.
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
help SUPPORT Insulin Pumpers http://www.insulin-pumpers.org/donate.shtml
- No Subject
- From: "Elizabeth/ Sonya" <email @ redacted>