[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [IPp] POP Statistics?



That's all I wanted--i think high and low is more professional.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael" <email @ redacted>
To: <email @ redacted>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [IPp] POP Statistics?


> > Michael--I looked at your statistics on HgBA1C and identifying "best"
and
> > "worst" levels will only give people, especially parents a feeling of
guilt
> > and saddness if their child's A1C is in the 7.5 range.  That isn't a
"bad"
> > level---especially for kids that are growing, ill over the winter etc.
You
> > need to be especially careful of the labels that you apply to statistics
so
> > that you don't ruin your own message--that pumps are great and great for
> > kids.  Mary, mother of Chris, age 7, diagnosed at 3.
>
> The labels are the averages of the 'best' and 'worst' for individuals
> and don't carry any other meaning. Perhaps 'highest' and 'lowest'
> would be more politically correct :-)
>
> Michael
> email @ redacted
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
> help SUPPORT Insulin Pumpers http://www.insulin-pumpers.org/donate.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
help SUPPORT Insulin Pumpers http://www.insulin-pumpers.org/donate.shtml