[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
  [Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [IP] Re: Dumb Software

> >If I have a low BG, I am likely to
> >be testing because I think its low in the first place, and I'm also
> to
> >be re-testing it in 15 minutes to make sure I've properly treated it.
> >Sometimes it takes longer than 15 minutes for the OJ to show up in my BG
> >reading, and as a result, I now have multiple readings with a low number,
> I can relate.  Actually, I'm doing one thing that I've not seen anyone
> do, which I call "interpolated average". Essentially, it calculates your
> average BG level taking into account the duration between readings.  For
> example, if you have 3 readings...

How is this different or better than a time weighted average?

Incidentally, I calculate my time weighted average with the spreadsheet I
use for logging and I have spent a LOT of time, with about 2 years of data,
trying to use that to accurately  correlate with A1c values. Not much
success so far.

for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
send a DONATION http://www.Insulin-Pumpers.org/donate.shtml