Re: [IP] Animas "taking advantage" of MM
>I think everyone misread my message. Nothing about it was negative against
>Animas. In fact, I think it is smart of Animas to "take advantage" of the
>situation! I was merely posting this as informational and interesting.
>Yikes. Even when I post something I get attacked on the matter! Sorry I
>ever mentioned it.
Oh no, you seem to have misinterpreted what I wrote, Ryan. I wasn't
attacking you ;>) Merely pointing out that Animas had used that
phrase for years before you had even started pumping. :>) I do
find it interesting that you say that you were not posting negative.
I will now presume that if you put something in quotes, i.e. "take
advantage", "steal", that you are not doing this for emphasis, only
that your words should be "taken with a grain of salt", or a great
deal of skepticism. Am I correct in this, or have I "misinterpreted"
>(BTW, I have been to Animas' site many times in the past few years...this is
>the first time I have ever seen this page...so please excuse me if it has
>existed prior to this.)
>I'll leave now. Sorry, I'm just annoyed at how rude people are being!
I'm not meaning to be "rude". The point is that every pump that is
"water/tight/proof" has the possibility of having that compromised.
What is important is our safety if that should happen. Some H-trons
have proven to be unsafe in that they "over-bolused". Now the same
has been said of the Paradigms. I want a pump that has the software
checks to be sure that it is not capable of "over-bolusing".
>(besides, it's not which pump will stay watertight; what's in
>question is what happens when the watertight fails, H-trons and
>Paradigms over-bolus, Animas does NOT, it has 'smart' safety checks)
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: