[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[IP] RE: "a diabetic" vs. "diabetic"
>Just be aware that there are those of
>us that may view you as having less creditability because you use (in
>opinion) outmoded terminology.
The key there is "in my opinion". The fact is, the dictionary
lists "diabetic" as BOTH a noun AND an adjective, and it is fully
acceptable and proper (NOT outmoded) to use the term either way.
>I think you will find that these are old terms (50+ years in use)
>that more recent chronic diseases don't have such constructions.
Certain forms of words don't allow themselves to be modified in this
way. Certain words do. And, many people have argued that moving to
more modern terminology is leading to "the downfall of American
society". ;-) Well, not really in those terms...but they see the
transition from more "proper" English and older-styles to more modern
forms to be a BAD thing.
>That "a diabetic" is a shorter form or less awkward - I seldom find
>actually the case, though it may be in some situations.
You seldom do...but I always prefer diabetic to "person with
diabetes". I look for conciseness and clarity when writing, NOT PCness.
>I must assume that you miss other
>subtle denotations in English and miss much of the poetry and meaning
>expressed in English when properly used.
As stated above, "diabetic" as a noun in 100% proper.
>As for being a "pumper", I see that as a choice, one that
doesn't "brand" me
>a victim of a chronic disease
In case someone hasn't told you with...you ARE the victim of a chronic
disease. How is "diabetic" any more branding than "person with
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
send a DONATION http://www.Insulin-Pumpers.org/donate.shtml