[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
  [Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [IP] RE: On my soapbox

>Oh puh-leeze!, Ryan.
>Are you saying that the risk of heart attacks and cancer from not having
>sex makes viagara more of a medical necessity  than the risk of heart
>attacks, stroke, renal failure, blindness, kidney failure, etc. from less
>than optimal testing of bg??  You can't be serious!


I'd like to know where in the world I ever said such a thing. I NEVER
compared what was MORE or LESS medically necessary.  I was merely pointing
out that viagra CAN be medically necessary if it allows a couple to have sex
who otherwise couldn't.

Please, read what I wrote, and don't assume things into what I wrote that is
not there.  Thanks.

for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: