[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [IP] Volume of Email
maybe it's just me but the more i hear somthing the better it sinks in isay
keep the great advice and mail a come'n!
NO SURRENDER NO RETREAT!!
email @ redacted
> From: Dan Oliver <email @ redacted>
> To: email @ redacted
> Subject: Re: [IP] Volume of Email
> Date: Monday, February 09, 1998 2:04 PM
> Here's my $.02 on the subject...
> Unless a response is _truly_ private, I'd like to be the one to decide
> whether or not a particular message is interesting or useful to me. If
> involves wading through a lot of messages that _aren't_ interesting to
> so be it. At least I had the chance to see them and judge for myself.
> If the email volume becomes too much to handle, I'll switch to digest
> As far as locating private email addresses, they're pretty easy to find
> the Members section of the web site.
> At 10:30 2/9/98 -0800, Janine wrote:
> >My only concern with what Katie said is the following:
> >>It may also be helpful if we respond privately (the senders private
> >>address is supplied when they post each email) rather than hitting
> >>the group cannot benefit as a whole from the info.
> >I think responding privately is great if it is personal but sometimes
> >person's return e-mail *does not* show up, to me at least. I put my
> >address in my signature file, so it goes out automatically in the text.
> >Other than that I agree, especially with more careful use of subject
> >changes when appropriate.
> >Vancouver, BC, Canada
> >email @ redacted