RE: [IP] Fwd: Fw: Suicide on the instalment plan.(Diet coke)
- To: email @ redacted
- Subject: RE: [IP] Fwd: Fw: Suicide on the instalment plan.(Diet coke)
- From: Doug Boss <email @ redacted>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:21:38 -0600
- Reply-To: email @ redacted
- User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2
Give me a break
If you are going to make such broad stroke statements about a product and cite
universities etc - At least be good enough to link to the specific reference or
gove enough detail so it can be confirmed.
Its funny that a hoax debunking site that provides links and references is
deemed no more credible than the hoax itself.
To state that Aspartame is classifed as a drug as far as you know is nothing
more than an unsubstantiated scare tactic.
To use your words "PLEASE DON'T FORGET that urban myth web sites are also "INFO
YOU GET ON THE WEB"!!!!!!! - You have no more reason to believe these emails
than any other"
Here is quote from FDA
" Is aspartame safe?
After reviewing scientific studies, FDA determined in 1981 that aspartame was
safe for use in foods. In 1987, the General Accounting Office investigated the
process surrounding FDA's approval of aspartame and confirmed the agency had
acted properly. However, FDA has continued to review complaints alleging
adverse reactions to products containing aspartame. To date, FDA has not
determined any consistent pattern of symptoms that can be attributed to the use
of aspartame, nor is the agency aware of any recent studies that clearly show
Here is link to Stanford University medical schools information
"After reviewing the latest data, scientific advisors to the European Union
recently confirmed that aspartame is SAFE. Other authorities, including the
FDA, American medical Association, and WHO, have reached to the same
I found no info on any specific stanford studies on aspartame - there are a few
blog entries that seem to be associated with stanford that talk about the
Rumsfeld connection but a blog isnt a reliable source to me
Dont mean this as an attack but I had to reply
My nickels worth
Quoting Susan Kinzelman <email @ redacted>:
> It's the result of a lot of evil politics.
> Unfortunately it is the urban legend that is the myth.
> There is quite a bit of truth to the concept that aspartame affects people
> with diabetes.
> At some point someone decided to turn it into an urban legend to serve
> their own purposes..
> You have to remember that Donald Rumsfeld was CEO of Searle and he really
> pushed to get it approved.
> It was a very difficult battle because the FDA did not want to approve it
> for many years.
> Several legitimate universities for instance , have
> studied it
> and found it to affect diabetics adversely.
> If you search on the web you can find the information from reputable
> You can also use the freedom of information act (while it still exists) to
> request the data from the FDA's own study.
> I believe it is now classified as a drug , which will interact with other
> drugs, etc. but I'm not positive.
> PLEASE DON'T FORGET that urban myth web sites are also "INFO YOU GET ON THE
> You have no more reason to believe these sites than any other.
> At 12/14/2004-10:37 PM, you wrote:
> >It appears to be a new take on old urban legend
> for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe/change list versions,
> contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe/change list versions,