[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
  [Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [IP] Another whopper of a lawsuit



----- Original Message -----
From: Handsfield, James H. (PHPPO) <email @ redacted>
To: <email @ redacted>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: RE: [IP] Another whopper of a lawsuit


> Even if the coffee was only 165 degrees, why would she put it between her
legs? And why are juries rewarding stupidity???
Joanne
>     http://www.insulin-pumpers.org/donate.shtml
>
> Your annual contribution will eliminate this header from your IP mail
>
> Wayne [mailto:email @ redacted] wrote:
>
>
> In the end, after appeals, she received payment for her treatment and a
> small amount extra for her suffering - nowhere near the $Millions
originally
> awarded in court.
>
> A significant problem with these lawsuits against fast food companies is
> that the plaintiff(s) will have to demonstrate that these foods are
somehow
> addictive and that their ability to control the appetite was intentionally
> diminished due to the makeup of the menus and the specific foods served.
> It's quite a stretch, IMHO.
>
> Jim Handsfield
> email @ redacted
>
> The opinions expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily represent
those
> of my wife who runs our house and makes more important decisions than I
do.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact:
> HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
----------------------------------------------------------
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact:
HELP@insulin-pumpers.org