Re: [IP] RE: Alternate site testing
In a message dated 08/17/2003 1:32:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
email @ redacted writes:
> Im not trying to promote one meter over another. just stating my
> i started with the ultra... it IS very fast... one of the reasons, is the
> very second, it sees
> the first bit of blood, it starts timing... IF the little canal, is not
> full, within the 5 seconds,
> the strip is trashed... i have thrown away hundreds of them.
> i have been very unsuccessful, at "BB king" testing, with the ultra..
> (ive also been very unsuccessful, at playing guitar like BB, but, thats a
> whole other story)
> Therasense (freestyl), seems to have taken an entirely different
> it will NOT start timing, until it detect the quality of blood, required to
> perform a test...
> I have been VERY successful, using the back of my wrist....
> (funny thing is, when people see me do this, they THINK of the ultra, just
> because of the BB King commercial) (who says advertising doesnt work ??)
> Accuracy... i cant speak of that, but, it does appear, that no 2 meters,
> (even 2 of the same brand), never seem to agree... it certainly is close
> enough, so it seems, for my needs, and I dont seem to have any problems,
> related to "delays caused by WHERE im testing".....
Len I am in agreement with you about BB. I just got a new Tracker from
Therasense. I am still using fingers, but have used the heal of my hand and
other sites down the road. I have used the Precision xtra for the last 4 or 5
years. I could not believe the speed and size of blood drop. I find my xtra
is 15 to 20 points higher. I will check it to a lab next time I go to Joslin.
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: