[Previous Months][Date Index][Thread Index][Join - Register][Login]
[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [IP] control too tight?



when you find out please foward on to me as well. thanks anne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Gilmer Jr." <email @ redacted>
To: <email @ redacted>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: [IP] control too tight?


> HI,
>
>    WHAT WEB SITE DID YOU FIND THE BASAL RATE CALCULATOR?
>
>                                                                 THANKS,
>
>
> BILL
>
> >From: "Michael" <email @ redacted> >Reply-To:
> email @ redacted >To: email @ redacted >Subject: Re: [IP]
> control too tight? >Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:44:18 -0800 >MIME-Version:
> 1.0 >Received: from [63.77.172.2] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> MHotMailBD51ADAC00B3400431E33F4DAC0210990; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:45:02
> -0700 >Received: from bzs.org (email @ redacted
> [192.168.1.190])by ns2.bizsystems.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
> TAA15707;Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:44:27 -0700 >Received: (from
> email @ redacted)by bzs.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7Q2iOc19142for
> insulin-pumpers-outgoing; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:44:24 -0700 >Received: from
> gomer.is.bizsystems.com (gomer.is.bizsystems.com [192.168.1.166]) by
> bzs.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id f7Q2iNf19131 for
> <email @ redacted>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:44:23 -0700 >From
> email @ redacted Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:45:11 -0700
> >X-Authentication-Warning: pandora.is.bizsystems.com: majordomo set
> sender to email @ redacted using -f >Message-Id:
> <email @ redacted> >In-reply-to:
> <email @ redacted> >Sender: email @ redacted
> >Precedence: bulk > > > > Also, on another topic, I played with the basal
> rate calculator on > > the web site today (using the basal testing info I
> based current > > rates on) -- it was fun -- I never COULD get a straight
> line, but I > > got lines that were straighter than what I now get. What
> amazed me > > was how TINY increments of time and insulin could make big
> changes! > > So I'm trying it out, cautiously, just to see what happens
> -- I can > > always change back if it doesn't work out! > > > >The
> estimator is only indicative and actually may be more well >behaved than
> a real person because it behaves in a fairly linear >manner. The human
> body, in the absence of it servo-mechanism >(pancreas), is probably a
> litte more unstable :-( > >It's a reasonable model and when I've used it
> for Lily, it's worked >well. >email @ redacted
> >---------------------------------------------------------- >for HELP or
> to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org >send a
> DONATION http://www.Insulin-Pumpers.org/donate.shtml
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
> send a DONATION http://www.Insulin-Pumpers.org/donate.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------
for HELP or to subscribe/unsubscribe, contact: HELP@insulin-pumpers.org
send a DONATION http://www.Insulin-Pumpers.org/donate.shtml